Taib Mahmud was the federal-level Primary Industries Minister in charge
of oil and gas when the Petroleum Act 1974 was passed by Parliament.
COMMENT
KUCHING: Chief Minister Taib Mahmud’s turnaround on the oil royalty
issue after 31 years in power and the fact that he preferred “private” and
“amicable discussions” with the federal government have raised more questions.
Uppermost on the list is whether Taib and his predecessor and uncle,
Abdul Rahman Yakub, had knowingly “surrendered” Sarawak’s rights over oil and
gas to the federal government.
Sarawakians who have read Taib’s biography – “A Soul You Can See” –
written by Douglas Bullis and who remember their history, would recall that
Taib was the federal-level Primary Industries Minister who was in charge of the
nation’s oil and gas resources.
This being the case, was Taib responsible for the lopsided oil agreement
and the Petroleum Development Act passed in Parliament in 1974?
The Act was passed following a confrontation between Opec (Organisation
of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) and oil companies over oil price policies
in 1973.
Expounding on the 1973 “crisis”, Taib was quoted by Bullis as saying:
“By 1973 I realised Malaysia and the oil companies were headed for a
confrontation over their purchase price policies.
“There was too much take and too little give, and Malaysia’s people have
an ethic based on balance,” Taib had said in page 88 of the book.
“Eventually I came up with the idea that we should base Malaysia’s oil
concession policy on shared production agreements.
“Naturally I was snubbed by oil companies who claimed the Malaysian
government was moving towards nationalisation.”
Taib’s silence
Bullis said that it was obvious that Malaysia’s post-1974 policy on
taking control of Malaysia’s petroleum interests from oil companies was largely
Taib’s works.
It is well known in Sabah that its then chief minister Mustapha Harun
and his successor Fuad (Donald) Stephens refused to sign the oil agreement
giving 5% of oil royalty to Sabah, but Sarawak under Abdul Rahman was said to
be “too willing” and signed the agreement.
But the question is: Did the nephew and the uncle “surrender” Sarawak’s
rights over oil and gas to the federal government in order to please the then
prime minister Abdul Razak in return for political and financial support?
Sarawak was at that time in turmoil following the sacking of its chief
minister Stephen Kalong Ningkan in 1966.
At the time there were incessant allegations by the Parti Pesaka anak
Sarawak president Temenggong Jugah anak Barieng that the Ibans were shabbily
treated by Abdul Rahman and Taib.
Abdul Rahman was also facing an “internal rebellion” against his
leadership from within Pesaka, which had by then (in 1973) merged with Parti
Bumiputera to form Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB).
At the point of signing the oil agreement, Sarawak was said to be
politically unstable and needed the support of the federal government.
Could history be the reason why Taib has been silent on the royalty
issue during his 31-year tenure as chief minister? And why he has been
compliant to Umno in the peninsula, having pumped millions into its coffers?
What off-the-table deal did Taib and Abdul Rahman eventually strike with
the federal leadership that allowed them to sustain Sarawak’s “independence” as
opposed to Sabah’s “colonialisation” by Kuala Lumpur?
What has now compelled Taib to call for re-negotiations on the oil
royalty issue?
It certainly cannot be fear of losing his grip in Sarawak because he has
already won the state election held in April last year.
If it is the parliamentary election, Sarawak BN coalition is unlikely to
lose more than 10 of the 31 parliamentary seats. And that too the losses will
come from Chinese-based Sarawak United People’s Party, Sarawak Progressive
Democratic Party and Parti Rakyat Sarawak. Less likely will it be from Taib’s
own PBB.
So what then is compelling Taib to go to the “private” negotiation
table? What cards will he pull and how will he keep “wanting” Umno away from
Sarawak?- Free Malaysia Today
1 comment:
[...]"Did Taib "surrender" oil right to BN?"[...]
The very question is blunt ricidule. No one person has the legal consitutional right to do so. Due process should have made it team of negotiators comprising of government leaders and civil society leaders. The whole thing was a rip off.
But the formation of Malaysia was a rip off with plenty of residual interests and influence of the colonial imperialist Brits.
I'd like to see a Council Negeri official record that says Sarawak rights in its mineral oil resources were duly agreed to be "given away" to Malaysia.
If the Federal Gov wants to set up a branch office of dept or ministry on a piece of Sarawak land it has to follow Sarawak laws. Having purchased a lease within legal terms, it can well earn whatever is underneath! So too with mineral oil and gas rights.
Malaysia does not own Sarawak!
Post a Comment